To the Editor:
It was interesting to watch the School Board meeting as they received the Lights Feasibility Report. What was the purpose of a feasibility study for “Football Lights?” Was it a solution looking for a problem? Did it show the contribution of lights to the football program? Did the board learn anything? Were they open to any options?
I am reading a current book “Learn or Die” by Professor Hess of the Darden School that addresses the importance of having a learning organization. While the focus of the book is on business organizations I think it could apply to organizations for learning … school systems. The learning organization is open to different views to find the optimum solution. It seems that letters to the Gazette Packet have identified a range of views for consideration. Recent articles in the Washington Post have reviewed the potential contribution of football to individual development and at the same time concern for safety and attention to the issue of concussions. A recent PBS Newshour program featured the T.C. Williams football coach and trainer along with some of the players discussing the concerns of concussions. What are the football program needs?
What are the athletic program needs? Clarify “needs” and “wants”. Let’s focus on the big picture, the whole system. Lots of questions … how to decide? A basic rule in systems theory is “Do not optimize at the sub-system level.” The system should be defined as the athletic program or the overall high school education program. Current practices suggest good decision-making should not be binary, yes or no, but a choice among at least three options. Fiscal decisions should recognize Economics 101 – “There are always limited resources.” The ability to learn is the foundation for continuing improvement. Professor Hess offers comprehensive summaries of learning conversations and critical thinking tools for learning organizations. Seems like an approach for the Strategic Plan. Keep the focus on Learning.