Virginia’s General Assembly killed 20 of the 24 campaign finance reform bills introduced during the 2022 legislative session. The defeated bills include attempts to restrict the personal use of campaign funds, place limits on campaign contributions, improve disclosure from dark money groups, and ban contributions from public utilities.
Awaiting a signature from Gov. Glenn Youngkin are two bills pertaining to disclosure, an oversight bill which strengthens the Department of Elections’ ability to monitor and enforce campaign finance regulations, and a resolution extending a study of campaign finance reform in Virginia.
Bills sponsored by Republicans and Democrats in the House and the Senate, including Del. Lee Ware (R-65) and Sen. Richard Stuart (R-28), would have prohibited campaigns from accepting contributions from public utilities. Because members of the General Assembly shape the laws public utilities operate under, contributions from these entities can lead to a perceived conflict of interest. The bill failed to pass out of the House Privileges and Elections committee where 13 of the 24 introduced campaign finance reform bills came to die.
Sen. John Bell (D-13) sponsored a bill, along with Delegates Marcus Simon (D-53) and Mike Cherry (R-66), to prevent candidates for state office from using campaign contributions for personal use. A similar bill unanimously passed the House last year before being defeated in the Senate. This year, the bill passed through the Senate while encountering stiff resistance in the House Privileges and Elections committee along party lines, leaving Virginia one of a handful of states with no law prohibiting the personal use of campaign funds. Bills capping contributions, implemented in 45 other states, continue to be elusive. Four bipartisan bills which would cap contributions from individuals were introduced in this General Assembly, two in the House of Delegates and two in the Senate. The two bills in the Senate would have set limits at $20,000-25,000 per donor in each election cycle. The caps of these bills are nearly seven times higher than the federal limits of $2,900 per individual to federal candidates. Introduced by Democratic Senators Chap Petersen (D-34) and Joe Morrissey (D-16) , the bills died immediately with similar bills in the House killed during their first hearing.
Of the four campaign finance reform bills that did pass, two relate to campaign finance disclosure. HB 125, sponsored by Del. Glenn Davis (R-84), establishes a fine of up to $25,000 for sponsors violating campaign advertisement disclosure laws. HB 86, sponsored by Del. Tim Anderson (R-83) directs the Department of Elections to create a searchable online database containing information about campaign finance reports. It is still in play because of delays in finalizing the state budget. Eight other disclosure bills, some of which would have strengthened reporting by dark money groups, died in committee. A bill requiring campaigns to keep certain records that may be subject to review by the Department of Elections passed nearly unanimously. However, it has a delayed implementation date of 2024, allowing legislators to get through the next election cycle without any oversight. Finally, a resolution extending a study of campaign finance reform in Virginia by a joint subcommittee passed without any dissent.
Good governance advocates Heidi Drauschak, Executive Director of VAOurWay and Nancy Morgan, coordinator of the VA Chapter of American Promise, expressed their disappointment that many common sense campaign finance bills never made it out of committee. “Citizens of the Commonwealth should be disappointed. After the most expensive election in Virginia history and, 30 years after the Governor Wilder Ethics Commission report recommended campaign finance reform, 2022 should have been the year for bipartisan wins for reform and good governance laws.” They highlighted that the continuation of the work of the Joint Legislative Subcommittee means that comprehensive reform will be implemented in Virginia, just not in 2022.Several Arlington residents, when asked how they felt about campaign finance reform, said they were not qualified to respond as the issue was not one they follow closely - even though a few weeks before the start of the General Assembly a poll showed an overwhelming 78% of Virginians said they support reducing money from big campaign donors, and 88% of Virginians support public disclosure of contributions. Virginia held its most expensive election in history last year, with a record amount of money — $7 million — contributed by undisclosed donors. For more information on how to follow campaign finance reform, see www.MoneyOutVa.org, which provides information about which bills passed and which failed. MoneyOutVa is also sponsoring a “Roundtable on the Status of Good Governance Legislation" Wednesday, March 23 at 7 pm, the link to which is also on their website. MoneyOutVa suggests to those who want to hold their legislators accountable, “Find out when your elected officials are organizing a post-legislative town hall; they do this every end of session. Attend and ask them, "Why did the General Legislature kill 20 out of 24 campaign finance bills this year?" Or "What is your position on campaign finance reform in VA?”
More like this story
- Commentary: Campaign FInance Reform is Alive but Needs Support in Arlington
- Campaign FInance Reform Bills Are Struggling in Arlington
- Virginians Lost Last Week When House Voted Down Bills
- Campaign Finance Reform Finds Support in Both Parties in Arlington
- After House Approval of Bill Legalizing Marijuana Nationwide, Attention Turns to Senate in MD